Latino Voters Will Blame Republicans If Immigration Reform Fails, Poll Says

Poll Reveals Who Latino Voters Will Blame If Immigration Reform Fails
|
Open Image Modal
U.S. House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican from Ohio, speaks during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014. Boehner said it would be difficult to pass an immigration bill because fellow Republicans dont trust President Barack Obama to implement the law, a position that shrinks chances for House action this year. Photographer: Pete Marovich/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Latino voters will blame Republicans if immigration reform fails to pass, according to a poll released Tuesday.

A survey of 800 registered Hispanic voters by pollster Latino Decisions on behalf of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a progressive think tank, found that 49 percent of respondents would place the blame for failing to pass immigration reform on the GOP, while 16 percent would hold Democrats responsible. The Republican Party could boost its standing among Latino voters by getting behind reform efforts, the poll indicated.

The survey provided yet more evidence that the issue of immigration reform matters to Latino voters and will influence their perception of both political parties as the 2014 elections approach. In a slideshow presentation of the results, the pollsters predicted that if House Republicans refuse to allow a vote on immigration reform, they will “only further their image as anti-immigrant and anti-Latino.”

“The Republican Party really stands to lose a lot of ground if they continue to appear as obstructionists,” co-founder of Latino Decisions Matt Barreto said Tuesday on a conference call with reporters.

Some 71 percent of Latino voters said it is either “very or extremely important” to pass comprehensive immigration reform this year, according to the poll.

The U.S. Senate passed a bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform bill last year, supported by the White House, that included both a pathway to citizenship and more than $40 billion in increased spending on border enforcement.

But the measure has been stuck in the House of Representatives, where many in the Republican majority oppose it. Latino voters have taken note, with 68 percent of the poll’s respondents saying they disapprove of House Republicans’ handling of immigration. By contrast, 54 percent of respondents approve of Obama’s handling of the issue, and 49 percent approve of the way House Democrats handled it.

Jorge Ramos, a popular anchor for Univision News with significant influence among Hispanics, has repeatedly blamed House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) for the failure to pass immigration reform, pointing out that Boehner has refused to allow the Senate bill to the floor for a vote.

The poll didn’t contain just doom and gloom for Republicans, however. The results indicated that Latinos would be more sympathetic to the GOP if the party were to support immigration reform. Some 61 percent of respondents said they would be more likely to listen to what the party has to say on other issues if Republicans in Congress help pass an immigration reform bill.

Democrats continue to struggle with the issue as well. While the survey said Latino voters hold Republicans more responsible for the impasse over immigration reform, a separate poll released earlier this month by Latino Decisions showed that young Hispanic voters who were aware of Obama's record-setting number of deportations view the Democratic Party less favorably.

The Republican National Committee recognized in an “autopsy report” following the 2012 presidential election that the party’s opposition to immigration reform had alienated Latino voters. The report recommended boosting outreach and supporting comprehensive reform.

The RNC has bolstered its efforts to cultivate the Latino vote by establishing permanent Hispanic outreach staff in seven states. Several prominent national Republicans, including Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.), have thrown their support behind bipartisan efforts at reform.

In some races, however, conservative voters continue to throw their support behind immigration hawks, putting forth the kind of message the pollsters say will alienate Latino voters.

Texas state Sen. Dan Patrick (R-Houston), who has repeatedly warned of a "Mexican invasion," handily won the state's GOP nomination for lieutenant governor. Tea-party-affiliated candidate Tim Donnelly, who has accused undocumented immigrants of launching an “insurgency,” is in a neck-and-neck race for the GOP gubernatorial nomination in California.

“We continue to find that Republicans have an opportunity to repair their image among Latinos,” Barreto said. He added that, to reap the benefit, the party “must demonstrate leadership” on immigration reform.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

6 Misconceptions About The Border
The U.S.-Mexico border is violent(01 of06)
Open Image Modal
It certainly is in some places, but those don't tend to be on the U.S. side. In fact, El Paso, Texas and San Diego, California are the two safest cities in the country, according to Congressional Quarterly. While Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has repeatedly said the border in her state is dangerous, crime statistics reported by USA Today and The Huffington Post show that violent crime has dropped along the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona, as well as California, New Mexico and Texas. (credit:AP)
The porous U.S.-Mexico border is vulnerable to terrorists(02 of06)
Open Image Modal
That’s not the assessment of the U.S. government. The Mexico section of the most recent State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism reads:
No known international terrorist organization had an operational presence in Mexico and no terrorist group targeted U.S. citizens in or from Mexican territory. There was no evidence of ties between Mexican criminal organizations and terrorist groups, nor that the criminal organizations had political or territorial control, aside from seeking to protect and expand the impunity with which they conduct their criminal activity.
H/T: Washington Office on Latin America.
(credit:In this photo provided by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a silver Jeep Cherokee that suspected smugglers were attempting to drive over the U.S.-Mexico border fence is stuck at the top of a makeshift ramp early Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012 near Yuma, )
The border is insecure(03 of06)
Open Image Modal
Depends on how you define "secure." By practically all measurements, the border is at its most secure point in recent history. There's more than 20,000 Border Patrol agents stationed along the border now -- about double the number since 2004. Apprehensions along the border, one of the most reliable measures of illegal entry, are at their lowest level in 40 years. But politicians have yet to agree on how to define what "secure" will mean for legal purposes. (credit:In this Sept. 4, 2012, photo, Max Pons, manager of the Nature Conservancy's southernmost preserve, walks past the U.S.-Mexico border fence in Brownsville, Texas. (AP))
Obama has been soft on enforcement(04 of06)
Open Image Modal
Not so. In fact, it's one of the biggest gripes immigration activists have with him. While Obama has exempted many people who came to the United States as children from deportation, he has also set records, deporting over 400,000 people last fiscal year and removing more migrants in one term than George W. Bush did in two. (credit:A group of undocumented immigrants wait in line while being deported to Mexico at the Nogales Port of Entry in Nogales, Ariz., Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP))
The U.S. hasn't committed enough resources to securing the border(05 of06)
Open Image Modal
Again, depends on who you ask. The $18 billion the federal government spent on border enforcement in the 2012 fiscal year was more than it spent on than on other law enforcement agencies combined, according to the Migration Policy Institute -- about 15 times more than it did in the mid-1980s. Is that enough, especially in a context in which illegal immigration stands at net zero? If, not, what is? (credit:In this Aug. 9, 2012 file photo, a U.S. Border Patrol vehicle keeps watch along the border fence in Nogales, Ariz. (AP))
Illegal immigration continues to skyrocket(06 of06)
Open Image Modal
Nope. For all the talk from outraged politicians, you'd think that immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border remains at historically high levels. In fact, illegal immigration from Mexico has dropped to net zero or less, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. (credit:In this May 18, 2006 file photo, a man rests his hands on a fence looking out to the United States from a Mexican customs station after being detained by U.S. Border Patrol in Arizona and returned to Mexico in Nogales, Mexico. The border near Nogales is c)