States' New Opioid Limits Being Met With Some Resistance

An influx of federal money could prompt more states to adopt addiction treatment measures.

This piece comes to us courtesy of Stateline. Stateline is a nonpartisan, nonprofit news service of the Pew Charitable Trusts that provides daily reporting and analysis on trends in state policy.

For governors and lawmakers in nearly every state, the soaring overdose death toll from prescription painkillers, heroin and fentanyl has become an urgent priority.

Lawmakers in dozens of states took decisive action this year to stanch the flow of prescription pain drugs and help those addicted to them. Roughly 2.5 millionAmericans are addicted to opioids, and more than 28,000 people died of overdosesof painkillers or heroin in 2014, the highest toll ever.

To keep even more people from becoming addicted to medicines such as Percocet, OxyContin and Vicodin, lawmakers in five states set limits on the number of pills a physician can prescribe to a patient for the first time. Twenty-nine states beefed up monitoring of filled prescriptions to prevent addicts from “doctor shopping” for more pills.

Sixteen states expanded the use of naloxone, an overdose antidote drug few lawmakers had heard of just a year ago. And at least nine states adopted requirements that Medicaid and other insurers pay for all medically recommended addiction services, just as they would for other diseases, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Among lawmakers, governors and the medical community, there is broad support for measures aimed at rescuing people from fatal overdoses, providing more addiction treatment options and keeping highly addictive opioid pain medicines out of the hands of those who might abuse them. More doctors and patients are beginning to eschew opioids for alternatives such as anti-inflammatory medications, exercise, physical therapy, acupuncture and psychotherapy.

But the new laws are not without controversy. In several Northeast states, doctors are balking at new limits on the number of pills hospital emergency departments, physicians, dentists or nurses can prescribe for acute pain. Prominent medical groups, including the American Medical Association, argue that doctors and patients, rather than lawmakers, should be able to balance the need for pain relief against the risk of addiction in individual cases.

 

Open Image Modal
Pew's Stateline

Prescribing Limits

Dr. Yngvild Olsen, past president of the Maryland Society of Addiction Medicine, said the prescription limits, typically a seven-day supply of pills for a minor procedure or injury such as a tooth extraction or sprained ankle, could cause some doctors to simply stop prescribing opioids because many of them bristle at being told how to practice.

“Arbitrary pill limits or dosage limits are not the way to go,” said Dr. Patrice Harris, chairwoman of AMA’s committee on opioid abuse. “They are one-size-fits-all, blunt approaches.”

Dr. Andrew Kolodny, director of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing, said patients would be better served if states urged doctors to talk to them about the risk of addiction and required a signed informed consent before prescribing. States also could require doctors to write a detailed treatment plan before prescribing opioids, and insist that prescribers seek prior authorization from a pain expert before prescribing high doses of opioids, he said.

In March, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released recommendations for primary care physicians and others who prescribe opioid painkillers, the first time a federal agency has issued prescribing directives. The agency called on prescribers to voluntarily limit their first prescriptions for acute pain to a three-day supply or less, rather than a 30-day supply, which is common practice in most hospitals and physicians’ offices. The final guidelines noted that “more than seven days will rarely be needed.”

After the CDC released its preliminary recommendations late last year, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker proposed a mandatory three-day limit on first-time opioid prescriptions. State legislators opposed three days but agreed to seven, and Baker, a Republican, signed the compromise bill in March.

Seven-day limits also were adopted in Connecticut, New York, Maine and Rhode Island this year. Vermont left the precise number of days or pills for acute pain up to the state Health Department, which will consult with the state Medical Society before issuing a final rule.

In part, states were spurred to action by a National Governors Association committee formed to develop a unified state response to the opioid crisis.

At a February meeting of the group, Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin, a Democrat, called on fellow governors to stop doctors from handing out painkillers like candy or prescribing them “just in case” a patient needs them.

Prescription Drug Monitoring

In contrast to prescribing limits, there is little resistance to tougher prescription monitoring laws. States have been tracking prescriptions for opioids and other federally regulated substances since the 1930s, primarily as a tool for law enforcement. Today, every state except Missouri has some type of tracking system, but the rules governing who has access to the information, how quickly pharmacies must enter dispensing data, and which medications are included vary widely. 

By tapping into a database of prescriptions, doctors can check patients’ opioid medication history, as well as their use of other potentially harmful drugs, such as sedatives and muscle relaxants, to better assess the risk of addiction or overdose death. A new study by researchers at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee found that state tracking systems have helped lower overdose deaths over the last 20 years.

This year at least 29 states updated their prescription monitoring statutes to improve their effectiveness.

Updates include requirements that pharmacists track more medications and upload the data as prescriptions are filled rather than weekly or monthly, new provisions allowing prescribers to delegate a member of their team to access the confidential information, and requirements that physicians review nearly all patients’ prescription drug histories before prescribing opioids or other dangerous or addictive medications.

Emergency Overdose Treatment

Most fatal opioid overdose victims die from a lack of oxygen because their lungs shut down one to three hours after taking a drug. That leaves a substantial amount of time for a friend, family member or bystander to administer naloxone (sold as Narcan), which is highly effective at reversing the effects of opioid intoxication.

Naloxone was federally approved in 1971, but until the late 1990s it was only used in hospital emergency departments and operating rooms. Even emergency medical personnel and other first responders did not use the rescue drug initially.

The opioid epidemic, which first took hold in New England and Appalachia around 2006, changed that. As of last week, all but three states — Kansas, Montana and Wyoming — had laws ensuring first responders and others could get access to the life-saving drug.

In addition, at least 32 states and the District of Columbia have so-called good Samaritan laws that provide varying levels of legal immunity to bystanders who call for help when someone has overdosed on drugs.

This year, Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Iowa, Missouri and South Dakota enacted naloxone laws. Ohio enacted a “good Samaritan” law and Rhode Island renewed one that had expired.

More Treatment

Since January 2015, several states, including Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island and West Virginia, have adopted new laws aimed at expanding addiction treatment services for the growing number of people seeking them, according to NCSL.

New York’s new addiction treatment law, for example, requires insurers to give people seeking treatment immediate access to care and to cover at least 14 days of continuous treatment before requiring authorization from providers. It also requires health care providers to use objective, state-approved criteria to determine what level of care a patient needs.

To protect patients from potential overdose, New York’s new law also allows families to seek 72 hours of emergency treatment, up from 48 hours.

Some states, including California, Indiana and Missouri, adopted new Medicaid rules to ensure enrollees with drug addictions have access to high quality treatment options, including medications, residential care and outpatient counseling and therapy, according to the National Association of Medicaid Directors.

An influx of federal money could prompt more states to adopt addiction treatment measures. President Obama’s proposed 2017 budget includes $1.1 billion to help states make medication-assisted treatment more available to opioid addicts.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

27 Reasons Why U.S. Shouldn't Lead War On Drugs
Because Most Americans Are Unenthusiastic About It(01 of27)
Open Image Modal
Only 7 percent of Americans think the United States is winning the war on drugs, and few Americans are interested in throwing down more money to try to win, according to a Rasmussen Reports poll released in 2012. (credit:(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images))
Because The U.S. Won't Control The Flow Of Guns Into Latin America(02 of27)
Open Image Modal
Mexican authorities seized almost 70,000 weapons of U.S. origin from 2007 to 2011. In 2004, the U.S. Congress declined to renew a 10-year ban on the sale of assault weapons. They quickly became the guns of choice for Mexican drug cartels. Some 60,000 people have died in Mexico since President Felipe Calderón launched a military assault on the cartels in 2006. (credit:AP)
Because The United States Leads The Hemisphere In Drug Consumption(03 of27)
Open Image Modal
Americans have the highest rate of illegal drug consumption in the world, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Ignores Latin American Calls For A Rethinking Of Drug Policy(04 of27)
Open Image Modal
Several current and former Latin American presidents, like Fernando Henrique Cardoso, have urged the United States to rethink its failed war on drugs, to no avail. (credit:Getty Images / Fernando Henrique Cardoso, former president of Brazil and chair of The Global Commission on Drug Policy, speaks at a press conference June 2, 2011 in New York City to launch a new report that describes the drug war as a failure and calls fo)
Because Of The Fast And Furious Scandal(05 of27)
Open Image Modal
In an attempt to track guns as they moved across the U.S.-Mexico border, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms allowed smugglers to purchase weapons. The ATF lost track of the guns and they wound up in the hands of drug cartels -- even as far south as Colombia. (credit:AP)
Because American Politicians Refuse To Candidly Lead A Debate On Reforming Our Laws(06 of27)
Open Image Modal
Though the subject of marijuana legalization regularly ranks among the most popular at the digital town halls President Obama takes part in, he declines to address the issue or give it a thoughtful answer. Incidentally, a younger Obama supported marijuana decriminalization and a rethinking of the drug war. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Tortures Detainees In Cuba(07 of27)
Open Image Modal
Almost 800 prisoners accused of terrorism have have been held at the U.S. military prison of Guantánamo, Cuba, where they are detained indefinitely without facing trial. The United States has drawn international criticism from human rights defenders for subjecting the detainees there to torture and other cruel treatment. The Cuban government opposes hosting the U.S. naval base on its soil. (credit:AP - In this Oct. 9, 2007 file photo US military personnel inspect each occupied cell on a two-minute cycle at Camp 5 maximum-security facility on Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base in Cuba. )
Because The U.S. Has The World's Largest Prison Population(08 of27)
Open Image Modal
The United States has the world's largest prison population by far -- largely fed by the war on drugs -- at 500 per 100,000 people. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Jails Undocumented Immigrants Guilty Of Civil Violations(09 of27)
Open Image Modal
Because the United States imprisons roughly 400,000 immigrants each year on civil violations. (credit:AP)
Because The Border Patrol Kills Kids Who Throw Rocks(10 of27)
Open Image Modal
The U.S. Border Patrol has come under fire for killing minors who were throwing rocks. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Recognized An Illegal Government In Venezuela(11 of27)
Open Image Modal
When opponents of leftwing Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez briefly ousted him in 2002, the United States not only failed to condemn the coup, it praised the coup leaders. (credit:AP)
Because U.S. Extradition Undermines Justice In Colombia (12 of27)
Open Image Modal
When Colombia demobilized the largest rightwing paramilitary organization in 2006, if offered lenient sentences to those who would offer details on the atrocities the AUC committed. But rather than facing justice in their home country, Colombia has extradited several paramilitary leaders to the United States to face drug trafficking charges -- marking it harder for people like Bela Henríquez to find out the details surrounding the murders of their loved ones. "More than anger, I feel powerless," Henriquez, whose father, Julio, was kidnapped and killed on the orders of one defendant, told ProPublica. "We don't know what they are negotiating, what conditions they are living under. What guarantee of justice do we have?" (credit:Getty Images / Paramilitary heads are escorted by Colombian policemen from the maximum security jail of Itagui, Antioquia department, Colombia to Rionegro airport, 400km northeast of Bogota before their extradition to the US on May 13, 2008.)
Because The U.S. Helped Create Today's Cartels(13 of27)
Open Image Modal
The U.S funded the Guatemalan military during the 1960s and 1970s anti-insurgency war, despite awareness of widespread human rights violations. Among the recipients of U.S military funding and training were the Kaibiles, a special force unit responsible for several massacres. Former Kaibiles have joined the ranks of the Zetas drug cartel. (credit:Getty Images)
Because The U.S. Backed An Argentine Military Dictatorship That Killed 30,000 People(14 of27)
Open Image Modal
The rightwing military dictatorship that took over Argentina in 1976 "disappeared" some 30,000 people, according to estimates by several human rights organizations. They subjected countless others to sadistic forms of torture and stole dozens of babies from mothers they jailed and murdered. The military junta carried out the so-called "Dirty War" with the full knowledge and support of the Nixon administration. (credit:AP / Former Argentina's dictators Jorge Rafael Videla, left, and Reynaldo Bignone wait to listen the verdict of Argentina's historic stolen babies trial in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Thursday, July 5, 2012. )
Because The U.S. Helped Topple The Democratically Elected Government Of Salvador Allende(15 of27)
Open Image Modal
When it became clear that socialist Salvador Allende would likely win the presidency in Chile, U.S. President Richard Nixon told the CIA to "make the economy scream" in order to "prevent Allende from coming to power or to unseat him," according to the National Security Archive. Augusto Pinochet overthrew Allende in a bloody coup on Sept. 11, 1973, torturing and disappearing thousands of his political rivals with the backing of the U.S. government. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5772d4b6e4b0eb90355c97f9" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="13" data-vars-position-in-unit="31">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36536537@N04/7976450360" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="&#x25B2;DulCeCAriTo&#x25B2;" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5772d4b6e4b0eb90355c97f9" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36536537@N04/7976450360" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="14" data-vars-position-in-unit="32">▲DulCeCAriTo▲</a>)
Because the U.S. Backed A Military Coup In Brazil In 1964(16 of27)
Open Image Modal
The Brazilian military overthrew the democratically elected government of João Goulart in 1964, with the enthusiastic support of President Lyndon Johnson, ushering in two decades of repressive government. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Funded A Terrorist Group In Nicaragua(17 of27)
Open Image Modal
The Reagan administration funded the Contra rebels against the Marxist Sandinista government in Nicaragua. Regarded by many as terrorists, the Contras murdered, tortured and raped civilians. When human rights organizations reported on the crimes, the Reagan administration accused them of working on behalf of the Sandinistas. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Helped Finance Atrocities In Colombia(18 of27)
Open Image Modal
Through Plan Colombia, the U.S. has pumped over $6 billion into Colombia's military and intelligence service since 2002. The intelligence service has been disbanded for spying on the Supreme Court and carrying out smear campaigns against the justices, as well as journalists, members of Congress and human rights activists. The military faces numerous allegations of human rights abuse, including the practice of killing non-combatants from poor neighborhoods and dressing them up as guerrillas to inflate enemy casualty statistics. (credit:Getty Images / People demonstrate by covering themselves with sheets pretending they are false positive victims, during a protest against the false positives, massacres and forced disappearences by Colombian authorities on March 6, 2009, in Bogota.)
Because The U.S. Maintains A Trade Embargo Against Cuba Despite Opposition From The Entire World(19 of27)
Open Image Modal
For 21 years, the U.N. has condemned the U.S. embargo against Cuba and for 21 years the United States has ignored it. Some 188 nations voted against the embargo this year, with only the U.S. itself, Israel, Palau opposing. (credit:Getty Images / A street market sells necklaces and bracelets in Old Havana on November 12, 2012 in Havana, Cuba. )
Because The U.S. Engineered A Coup Against The Democratically Elected Government Of Guatemala In 1954(20 of27)
Open Image Modal
At the behest of United Fruit Company, a U.S. corporation with extensive holdings in Central America, the CIA helped engineer the overthrow of the Guatemalan government in 1954, ushering in decades of civil war that resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives. (credit:Getty Images / Politics, Guatemala/ Coups, pic: 28th June 1954, Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, right, (1914-1957) pictured when the rebel leader was leader of the forces that were to overthrow the Guatemalan President Arbenz in a military coup, The Guatem)
Because The U.S. Backed The Salvadoran Military As It Committed Atrocities In The 1980s(21 of27)
Open Image Modal
El Salvador's military committed atrocities throughout the 1980s with U.S. funding. (credit:AP / n this July 1989 file photo, from left, Col. Rene Emilio Ponce, formerly the head of the Salvadoran Armed Forces joint chiefs of staff, Rafael Humberto Larios, formerly El Salvador's defense minister, Col. Inocente Orlando Montano, formerly public sa)
Because The U.S. Invaded Haiti and Occupied It For Almost 20 Years(22 of27)
Open Image Modal
Woodrow Wilson ordered the Marines to invade and occupy Haiti in 1915 after the assassination of the Haitian president. The troops didn't leave until 1934. (credit:AP / Stenio Vincent)
Because The U.S. Invaded Haiti Again In 1994(23 of27)
Open Image Modal
One invasion wasn't good enough. The U.S. military returned in 1994. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Trained Military Leaders Who Committed Atrocities In Latin America(24 of27)
Open Image Modal
The School of the Americas in Ft. Benning, Georgia, trained soldiers and generals responsible for massacres and torture of tens of thousands of Latin Americans, according to Al Jazeera. (credit:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Flickr" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5772d4b6e4b0eb90355c97f9" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="3" data-vars-position-in-unit="21">Flickr</a>:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/84685738@N05/7910188768" role="link" class=" js-entry-link cet-external-link" data-vars-item-name="Caravan4Peace" data-vars-item-type="text" data-vars-unit-name="5772d4b6e4b0eb90355c97f9" data-vars-unit-type="buzz_body" data-vars-target-content-id="http://www.flickr.com/photos/84685738@N05/7910188768" data-vars-target-content-type="url" data-vars-type="web_external_link" data-vars-subunit-name="before_you_go_slideshow" data-vars-subunit-type="component" data-vars-position-in-subunit="4" data-vars-position-in-unit="22">Caravan4Peace</a>)
Because The U.S. Backed Dictator Rafael Trujillo(25 of27)
Open Image Modal
Rafael Trujillo Sr. (Photo by Hank Walker//Time Life Pictures/Getty Images) (credit:Getty Images)
Because The U.S. Invaded Cuba And Undermined The Island's Independence(26 of27)
Open Image Modal
The so-called "Spanish-American War" began in 1868 with the first of a series of three wars for Cuban independence. In 1898, the U.S. got involved, invading Cuba and occupying the island after forcing Spain to give it. The United States then forced Cuba to accept the odious Platt Amendent to its Constitution, which allowed the United States to intervene in the country militarily and established the U.S. military base at Guantánamo. (credit:AP)
Because The U.S. Colonized Puerto Rico(27 of27)
Open Image Modal
As long as you're invading Cuba, why not take Puerto Rico as well? The United States invaded in 1898 and the island remains a U.S. territory today. (credit:AP)