Abolish Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

Abolish Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Open Image Modal

As the rhetoric escalates over President Obama's nomination of judge Sonia Sotomayor, the confirmation process promises to reveal both the good and bad of our separation of powers. But consider that for the first 150 years of our nation's history, confirmation hearings were viewed with contempt. Or that state judges were not always elected officials.

At last summer's Aspen Ideas Festival, former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Yale law professor Stephen Carter participated in a lively panel discussion: The Single Worst Thing About How We Choose Our Judges. Their verdict, to paraphrase President Lincoln when discussing the nomination of Salmon P. Chase as chief justice: We cannot ask a man what he would do as a justice; And if he should tell us we would despise him for it.

Watch the full program and a series about the Supreme Court at FORA.tv.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost