Carl Icahn Could Make Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars Off His White House Gig

"He is simply a private citizen whose opinion the president respects," the White House says.
Open Image Modal
Billionaire Carl Icahn an 82 percent stake in the oil refiner CVR through his holding company, Icahn Enterprises. He told an ethanol trade group this year that Trump would sign an executive order that would save CVR hundreds of millions of dollars every year.
Reuters

Even in a White House plagued by unprecedented conflicts of interest, Carl Icahn is managing to set himself apart.

That’s no small feat and it’s possible because Icahn, a billionaire investor President Donald Trump named as a special adviser on regulatory reform, is not technically part of the White House.

He owns an 82 percent stake in the oil refiner CVR through his holding company and told an ethanol trade group this year that Trump would sign an executive order that would save CVR hundreds of millions of dollars every year.

Icahn speaks to the president “solely in his individual capacity,” White House spokeswoman Kelly Love told The Huffington Post. “He is simply a private citizen whose opinion the president respects and whom the President speaks with from time to time.” 

The White House also denies Icahn has a policymaking role.

But Icahn’s unpaid, informal advisory role means his communications with both industry officials and the White House can skirt the Freedom of Information Act and other forms of accountability. It is unclear if Icahn is telling industry players he speaks for the White House, but in financial and regulatory circles in New York City and Washington, D.C., people know he has a direct line, as one energy industry source told HuffPost.  

And Icahn seems to be doing his best to influence policy in a way that would benefit his company. Bob Dinneen, the head of an ethanol trade group, confirmed to Reuters news agency on Monday that Icahn told him Trump would be signing an executive order changing the Renewable Fuel Standard. The Environmental Protection Agency program requires fuel sold in the U.S. to contain certain amounts of biofuel, such as corn-based ethanol.

Under EPA rules, refiners must blend ethanol or biodiesel into gasoline or purchase Renewable Identification Numbers, swappable serial numbers attached to shipments of biofuel. Refiners expected to pay $1.8 billion in 2016 for renewable fuel credits, the price of which surged nearly 32 percent late last year. Icahn called the program the “mother of all short squeezes,” insisting it would bankrupt small refiners and ultimately make gas more expensive.

“The domino effect of this will be that ‘big’ oil will sop up the bankrupt refineries, causing an oligopoly resulting in skyrocketing gasoline prices,” Icahn said in August.  

“We need to know whether Icahn had access to nonpublic government information, and whether he directly or indirectly traded on that information.”

- Washington University School of Law legal ethics professor Kathleen Clark

CVR shares have risen just under 70 percent since election. Its stock rose 6 percent after that story ran, netting Icahn $126 million in gains. Share prices fell again after reports that the White House indicated there was no such plan; both Icahn and the White House have now said on the record that there was no executive order planned.

Since the election, Icahn has ratcheted up criticism of the RFS and its costs to his refiner. He wrote an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal in late November slamming the Obama administration’s EPA for choking out small- and medium-size oil refiners by forcing them to buy renewable fuel credits.

The EPA’s proposal was meant to encourage the use of more renewable biofuels, but it “threatens to destroy America’s oil refineries, send gasoline prices skyward and devastate the U.S. economy,” Icahn wrote. CVR said in regulatory filings that cost it about $200 million in 2016.

“The Trump administration, with new leadership at the EPA,” he wrote, “should move quickly next year to reform the biofuels mandate and forestall the crisis.”

Icahn’s advisory role, and the position it puts him in to influence policies that could benefit CVR, raises ethical red flags, said Kathleen Clark, a legal ethics professor at Washington University School of Law.

“We need to know whether Icahn had access to nonpublic government information, and whether he directly or indirectly traded on that information,” Clark said. “I believe that the White House refers to Icahn as an ‘adviser’ rather than as an ‘advocate’ or a ‘lobbyist,’ but that term may obscure his actual role: advocating for his own financial interests.”

This “is the purest definition of a conflict of interest that you can get,” Tyson Slocum of the watchdog group Public Citizen told Bloomberg. “It is clear that Icahn has played a role in influencing aspects of administration policy that have a direct financial impact on Icahn’s business at CVR.”

Icahn did not respond to a HuffPost request for comment. A spokeswoman for CVR, Brandee Stephens, declined to comment.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Donald Trump's Environment Guy Doesn't Believe In Climate Change
He does not believe in climate change.(01 of11)
Open Image Modal
“There has been a little bit of warming ... but it’s been very modest and well within the range for natural variability, and whether it’s caused by human beings or not, it’s nothing to worry about,” Ebell told Vanity Fair in 2007.

More than 97 percent of scientists agree that the world's climate is warming and it’s caused by human activities. Yet Ebell believes this consensus of climate experts is “phony” and “not based on science.”

In 2015, Ebell called Pope Francis’ encyclical on climate change “scientifically ill informed, economically illiterate, intellectually incoherent and morally obtuse.”

“It is also theologically suspect, and large parts of it are leftist drivel,” he added.
(credit:Getty Images)
Even if climate change is real, he believes there’ll be 'benefits.'(02 of11)
Open Image Modal
In a 2006 opinion piece, titled “Love Global Warming,” Ebell waxed lyrical about the potential “benefits” of climate change.

“Yes, rising sea levels, if they happen, would be bad for a lot of people. But a warming trend would be good for other people,” he wrote.

There would be “fewer and less severe big winter storms,” he claimed. And “life in many places would become more pleasant. Instead of 20 below zero in January in Saskatoon, it might be only 10 below. And I don’t think too many people would complain if winters in Minneapolis became more like winters in Kansas City.”

Ebell’s op-ed was full of fallacies.

For one, according to the EPA (which, again, is the agency that Ebell has been tapped to lead the transition of), climate change will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, including winter storms.
(credit:Carlos Barria/Reuters)
No surprise, he's not a scientist.(03 of11)
Open Image Modal
A self-described “policy wonk,” Ebell has no scientific experience. He graduated from Colorado College with a Bachelor of Arts degree in philosophy and later studied political theory in the London School of Economics. (credit:YouTube)
He wants to throw out the Clean Power Plan.(04 of11)
Open Image Modal
When President Barack Obama unveiled the Clean Power Plan in August last year, it was hailed as the strongest action ever taken by a U.S. commander in chief to combat climate change. The plan, which gives the EPA the authority to regulate carbon pollution from power plants, aims to slash greenhouse gas emissions from power plants by 32 percent by 2030.

Ebell has called the plan “illegal.” He said last year that he hoped the next president would “undo the EPA power plant regs and some of the other regs that are very harmful to our economy.”

Ebell, as the head of the EPA transition, is now “in a position to begin to do just that," The New York Times notes.
(credit:Associated Press)
The fossil fuel industry helps finance his advocacy group.(05 of11)
Open Image Modal
Ebell directs environmental and energy policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian advocacy group that “questions global warming alarmism and opposes energy-rationing policies, including the Kyoto Protocol, cap-and-trade legislation, and EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions,” according to its website.

The CEI has a long track record of taking money from the fossil fuel industry. It received $2 million from ExxonMobil from 1998 to 2005, according to Vanity Fair.

The Washington Post reported in 2013 that Marathon Petroleum, Koch Industries, American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, and American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers were among the donors for CEI’s annual dinner.

Murray Energy Corporation, America’s largest underground coal mining company (and a critic and litigant of the EPA), was the biggest energy donor of the night.

When asked about this on C-Span in 2015, Ebell — who had at first insisted that he doesn’t “represent” companies — admitted that he wasn’t getting as much money from energy firms as he’d like.

“I’d like to see a lot more funding from all of those companies, but unfortunately many of the coal companies are now going bankrupt,” he said. “I would like to have more funding so that I can combat the nonsense put out by the environmental movement.”
(credit:Lee Celano/Reuters)
He helped kill cap-and-trade.(06 of11)
Open Image Modal
Ebell previously “helped propel a shift in the political debate around climate change, contributing to the collapse of cap-and-trade legislation in Congress in 2009,” according to Frontline.

The bill, which Ebell called a “disaster,” would have seen limits set on the total amount of greenhouse gases emitted nationally.
(credit:Associated Press)
He chairs a group focused on 'dispelling the myths of global warming.'(07 of11)
Open Image Modal
The Cooler Heads Coalition, an ad-hoc group that Ebell leads, says its mission is “dispelling the myths of global warming by exposing flawed economic, scientific, and risk analysis.” (credit:Jorge Adorno/Reuters)
He opposes the Paris Agreement on climate change.(08 of11)
Open Image Modal
The Paris Agreement, which came into force on Nov. 4, is the most significant climate accord ever signed.

Ebell has been a vocal critic of the deal, calling Obama’s joining of the treaty “unconstitutional.”
(credit:How Hwee Young/Getty Images)
He’s worked to reduce protections for endangered species.(09 of11)
Open Image Modal
Earlier in his career, Ebell worked for then-Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) in an effort to rework the Endangered Species Act so it would involve “as little regulation as possible” and be “more respectful of property rights.” (credit:Tom Brakefield/Fuse)
He’s lobbied for the tobacco industry.(10 of11)
Open Image Modal
Jeremy Symons, senior advisor of the Environmental Defense Fund, says Ebell was involved in a "broad campaign" in the 1990s to help tobacco company Philip Morris make "regulating the tobacco industry ‘politically unpalatable.'"

Philip Morris also funded Ebell's group CEI in the 1990s. At the time, CEI was pushing the idea of “safer cigarettes.”
(credit:Associated Press)
He’s proud to be loathed(11 of11)
Open Image Modal
In a biography Ebell himself submitted when he testified before Congress, he boasted that he'd been listed by Greenpeace as a "climate criminal" and global warming "misleader" by Rolling Stone magazine.

"The Clean Air Trust in March 2001 named Mr. Ebell its 'Villain of the Month' for his role in convincing the Bush Administration not to regulate carbon dioxide emissions," the bio continued.
(credit:Sean Gallup/Getty Images)