PoliticsSupreme Court Greg Abbotttexas abortion law

Texas Governor Admits Anti-Abortion Law Was About Restricting Abortion

The cat's out of the bag.
Open Image Modal
By 

Senior Culture Reporter, HuffPost

|

After the Supreme Court on Monday struck down his state's law that would have shuttered dozens of abortion clinics, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) condemned the decision by arguing that it jeopardizes the state's objective "to protect innocent life."

"The decision erodes States’ lawmaking authority to safeguard the health and safety of women and subjects more innocent life to being lost," he said in a press release. "Texas' goal is to protect innocent life, while ensuring the highest health and safety standards for women."

Open Image Modal
Reuters Staff / Reuters

In admitting that the law, HB 2, was meant to limit abortions, Abbott deviated from the state's initial justification for the law, as presented during the case's oral arguments. Attorneys for the state noted that the law was implemented in order to "protect women's health" and improve safety at abortion clinics. When pressed by the justices, they insisted that “abortion is legal and accessible” in Texas.

HB 2 imposes obstacles on abortion clinics by requiring that they invest in expensive building upgrades to meet the more stringent standards of ambulatory surgical centers, or mini-hospitals. It also mandates that abortion doctors obtain admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. Since the law's passage in 2013, the number of abortion providers in the state has plummeted from 42 to 19.

In Monday's ruling, the Court affirmed that the law presents "a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking a previability abortion" and "an undue burden on abortion access."

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a concurring opinion eviscerating the state's argument that the law was passed to protect women's health.

“[I]t is beyond rational belief that H.B. 2 could genuinely protect the health of women, and certain that the law ‘would simply make it more difficult for them to obtain abortions,’” she wrote. “When a State severely limits access to safe and legal procedures, women in desperate circumstances may resort to unlicensed rogue practitioners ... at great risk to their health and safety.” 

Read more on the case, Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, and the Supreme Court's ruling here.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Exclusive Look Inside The Supreme Court
(01 of20)
Open Image Modal
A guard stands on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington on Oct. 5, 2015. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(02 of20)
Open Image Modal
Red velvet drapes hang at the back of the courtroom at the U.S. Supreme Court building June 20, 2015. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(03 of20)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in her chambers, shows the many collars (jabots) she wears with her robes. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(04 of20)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas jokes with his clerks as he describes their decision-making process in his chambers. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(05 of20)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts eats a bowl of soup as he sits down to lunch with his team of clerks in his private study at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on June 15, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(06 of20)
Open Image Modal
Justice Stephen Breyer looks for a favorite volume of Proust in his rare book collection in his chambers at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on June 8, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(07 of20)
Open Image Modal
A clock hangs above the bench in the Supreme Court on April 4, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(08 of20)
Open Image Modal
A notice is seen on a lectern where lawyers stand to argue before the Supreme Court justices. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(09 of20)
Open Image Modal
Name plates mark the spaces reserved for justices' families in the courtroom. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(10 of20)
Open Image Modal
Pencils, a reminder of how to address the court and a seating chart of the justices. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(11 of20)
Open Image Modal
Television journalists prepare for a news conference on the plaza in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building on June 9, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(12 of20)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan walks with her clerks in one of the four inner courtyards at the Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. June 20, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(13 of20)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben departs the U.S. Justice Department in traditional morning coat on his way to argue his one-hundredth case before the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. April 27, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(14 of20)
Open Image Modal
Carved oak walls and arches are seen in the reading area of the library at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. April 4, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(15 of20)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy delivers a lecture for visiting international attorneys in the West Conference Room at the Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. June 20, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(16 of20)
Open Image Modal
Daniel Agbleze waters flowers in one of the four inner courtyards at the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. June 6, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(17 of20)
Open Image Modal
Elevator operator Johnnie Bacon, from Washington, smiles at a passenger as he tends one of the elevators in the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. April 4, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(18 of20)
Open Image Modal
Reporters wait for the release of the text of the justices' opinions, timed to match the readings of the decisions from the bench, at the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. June 6, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(19 of20)
Open Image Modal
A circular staircase is seen in the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. January 28, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
(20 of20)
Open Image Modal
The courtroom of the U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, U.S. April 4, 2016. (credit:Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)
Suggest a correction
|
Submit a tip