We stand in the face of danger.
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Open Image Modal
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence depart the main clubhouse at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, U.S., November 19, 2016.
Mike Segar / Reuters

Let there be no doubt. We stand in the face of danger. Danger to our nation, to our values, to our liberties, to all that our nation stands for. We have done this to ourselves. We underestimated the risk. We did not work hard enough. We did not have the foresight to imagine that this could actually happen to us. It is our fault.

We must not make the same mistake again. Having turned our lives, our safety, and our children’s futures over to the whims of a thoughtless, reckless, ignorant, and immoral huckster, we must stand guard and fight back against peril

These are, indeed, perilous times. We should not underestimate the threat. We must remember that at different times throughout our history we have owned slaves, denied women the vote, segregated children because of their race, burned crosses, lynched innocent black men, interned almost 100,000 American citizens because of their Japanese ancestry, imprisoned thousands of Americans because they criticized the first World War, blacklisted tens of thousands of our fellow citizens because of their political beliefs during the age of McCarthy, and driven millions of our fellow Americans into the closet and treated them as strange freaks of nature because we ignorantly despised their sexual orientation. We are capable of great ugliness and hatred. Let us not kid ourselves.

We as a People have made a grievous mistake. This is a nation built on the promise of freedom, of equality, of dignity, of civility, of respect for the rule of law, and of the continuing search for moral progress. We have accomplished great things. We have ended slavery through a horribly painful Civil War. We have ended lynching. We have outlawed racial segregation. We have enacted laws designed to guarantee civil rights and voting rights and equal rights for historically oppressed members of our society. We have learned from our mistakes. We have struggled over time to see the light and to make this a stronger, fairer, and more decent nation. We have a long way to go, but we have much to be proud of.

Yet now we have taken a huge step backwards, even though a majority of the American people clearly rejected that step at the ballot box. But rules are rules, and rules should be respected. Individuals, though, need not be respected merely because they hold titles. They must earn our respect. They must earn our trust.

Donald Trump might turn out to be a decent president. But in his initial steps, he has cast grave doubts on that prospect. With decisions and appointments he has made in the days since the election he has already turned toward the dark side. Immediately after the election, President Obama, being the good and generous man that he is, asked us all to give the president-elect the benefit of the doubt. But in his initial actions our president-elect has already generated even more doubt about his understanding of and commitment to the most fundamental values of our nation. He has waved a flag of intolerance, injustice, and incivility.

“Courage,” Louis Brandeis once wrote, “is the secret of liberty.” We must remember that. We must be courageous. We must speak out. We must not be careless. We must not assume the best. We must not take our freedom for granted. If we do, there is a grave risk that we, our children, and our children’s children will suffer greatly for our indifference.

Listen to those who have thought hard about these dangers. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil,” Edmund Burke proclaimed, “is for good men to do nothing.” “Eternal vigilance,” declared the abolitionist Wendell Phillips, “is the price of liberty.” ”No man,” explained General Douglas MacArthur, “is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation.” “The future,” warned President Ronald Reagan, “doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted. It belongs to the brave.” Remember those words.

Perhaps things won’t be so bad. At this moment, though, we should prepare for a struggle for the very soul of our land. This election turned out the way it did because too many good-hearted, well-meaning, thoughtful, and caring people didn’t take the danger seriously enough. Let us not make that mistake again.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Donald Trump's Environment Guy Doesn't Believe In Climate Change
He does not believe in climate change.(01 of11)
Open Image Modal
“There has been a little bit of warming ... but it’s been very modest and well within the range for natural variability, and whether it’s caused by human beings or not, it’s nothing to worry about,” Ebell told Vanity Fair in 2007.

More than 97 percent of scientists agree that the world's climate is warming and it’s caused by human activities. Yet Ebell believes this consensus of climate experts is “phony” and “not based on science.”

In 2015, Ebell called Pope Francis’ encyclical on climate change “scientifically ill informed, economically illiterate, intellectually incoherent and morally obtuse.”

“It is also theologically suspect, and large parts of it are leftist drivel,” he added.
(credit:Getty Images)
Even if climate change is real, he believes there’ll be 'benefits.'(02 of11)
Open Image Modal
In a 2006 opinion piece, titled “Love Global Warming,” Ebell waxed lyrical about the potential “benefits” of climate change.

“Yes, rising sea levels, if they happen, would be bad for a lot of people. But a warming trend would be good for other people,” he wrote.

There would be “fewer and less severe big winter storms,” he claimed. And “life in many places would become more pleasant. Instead of 20 below zero in January in Saskatoon, it might be only 10 below. And I don’t think too many people would complain if winters in Minneapolis became more like winters in Kansas City.”

Ebell’s op-ed was full of fallacies.

For one, according to the EPA (which, again, is the agency that Ebell has been tapped to lead the transition of), climate change will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, including winter storms.
(credit:Carlos Barria/Reuters)
No surprise, he's not a scientist.(03 of11)
Open Image Modal
A self-described “policy wonk,” Ebell has no scientific experience. He graduated from Colorado College with a Bachelor of Arts degree in philosophy and later studied political theory in the London School of Economics. (credit:YouTube)
He wants to throw out the Clean Power Plan.(04 of11)
Open Image Modal
When President Barack Obama unveiled the Clean Power Plan in August last year, it was hailed as the strongest action ever taken by a U.S. commander in chief to combat climate change. The plan, which gives the EPA the authority to regulate carbon pollution from power plants, aims to slash greenhouse gas emissions from power plants by 32 percent by 2030.

Ebell has called the plan “illegal.” He said last year that he hoped the next president would “undo the EPA power plant regs and some of the other regs that are very harmful to our economy.”

Ebell, as the head of the EPA transition, is now “in a position to begin to do just that," The New York Times notes.
(credit:Associated Press)
The fossil fuel industry helps finance his advocacy group.(05 of11)
Open Image Modal
Ebell directs environmental and energy policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian advocacy group that “questions global warming alarmism and opposes energy-rationing policies, including the Kyoto Protocol, cap-and-trade legislation, and EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions,” according to its website.

The CEI has a long track record of taking money from the fossil fuel industry. It received $2 million from ExxonMobil from 1998 to 2005, according to Vanity Fair.

The Washington Post reported in 2013 that Marathon Petroleum, Koch Industries, American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, and American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers were among the donors for CEI’s annual dinner.

Murray Energy Corporation, America’s largest underground coal mining company (and a critic and litigant of the EPA), was the biggest energy donor of the night.

When asked about this on C-Span in 2015, Ebell — who had at first insisted that he doesn’t “represent” companies — admitted that he wasn’t getting as much money from energy firms as he’d like.

“I’d like to see a lot more funding from all of those companies, but unfortunately many of the coal companies are now going bankrupt,” he said. “I would like to have more funding so that I can combat the nonsense put out by the environmental movement.”
(credit:Lee Celano/Reuters)
He helped kill cap-and-trade.(06 of11)
Open Image Modal
Ebell previously “helped propel a shift in the political debate around climate change, contributing to the collapse of cap-and-trade legislation in Congress in 2009,” according to Frontline.

The bill, which Ebell called a “disaster,” would have seen limits set on the total amount of greenhouse gases emitted nationally.
(credit:Associated Press)
He chairs a group focused on 'dispelling the myths of global warming.'(07 of11)
Open Image Modal
The Cooler Heads Coalition, an ad-hoc group that Ebell leads, says its mission is “dispelling the myths of global warming by exposing flawed economic, scientific, and risk analysis.” (credit:Jorge Adorno/Reuters)
He opposes the Paris Agreement on climate change.(08 of11)
Open Image Modal
The Paris Agreement, which came into force on Nov. 4, is the most significant climate accord ever signed.

Ebell has been a vocal critic of the deal, calling Obama’s joining of the treaty “unconstitutional.”
(credit:How Hwee Young/Getty Images)
He’s worked to reduce protections for endangered species.(09 of11)
Open Image Modal
Earlier in his career, Ebell worked for then-Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) in an effort to rework the Endangered Species Act so it would involve “as little regulation as possible” and be “more respectful of property rights.” (credit:Tom Brakefield/Fuse)
He’s lobbied for the tobacco industry.(10 of11)
Open Image Modal
Jeremy Symons, senior advisor of the Environmental Defense Fund, says Ebell was involved in a "broad campaign" in the 1990s to help tobacco company Philip Morris make "regulating the tobacco industry ‘politically unpalatable.'"

Philip Morris also funded Ebell's group CEI in the 1990s. At the time, CEI was pushing the idea of “safer cigarettes.”
(credit:Associated Press)
He’s proud to be loathed(11 of11)
Open Image Modal
In a biography Ebell himself submitted when he testified before Congress, he boasted that he'd been listed by Greenpeace as a "climate criminal" and global warming "misleader" by Rolling Stone magazine.

"The Clean Air Trust in March 2001 named Mr. Ebell its 'Villain of the Month' for his role in convincing the Bush Administration not to regulate carbon dioxide emissions," the bio continued.
(credit:Sean Gallup/Getty Images)