Nuclear Option In Senate Marks Big Win For CWA

The Union That Pushed For - And Won - The Nuclear Option
|
Open Image Modal
President of Communications Workers of America Larry Cohen testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee's Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee hearing on the AT&T/T-Mobile merger, on May 11, 2011 in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON -- For Larry Cohen, the president of the Communications Workers of America union, the Senate Democrats' decision Thursday to go "nuclear" on presidential nominees calls for a celebration. And perhaps a short break from running around Capitol Hill.

"I'm very excited," Cohen told HuffPost shortly after the 52-48 vote, which will now allow Democrats to pass most executive and judicial nominees with a simple majority. "We've spent a lot of years working on Senate rules. This is finally a significant step."

Cohen's union is part of a coalition of progressive groups, called Fix the Senate Now, that has been pushing Democrats hard to change the chamber's rules and clear a path for nominees long blocked by the Republican minority. But Cohen and the CWA, in particular, have championed the cause, meeting constantly with lawmakers and taking their case to anyone willing to listen in recent months. Cohen said he started to feel confident two days ago that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) would pull the trigger this week.

"We were all over this," said Cohen, noting that CWA worked closely with civil rights and environmental groups.

CWA's concern in the issue was more obvious earlier this year, when GOP obstructionism threatened to shut down the National Labor Relations Board. That's the independent agency that serves as a referee between corporations and unions like the CWA, which has about half a million members. If the Senate couldn't confirm the president's nominees and the body lost its quorum, the NLRB wouldn't be able to issue decisions, throwing labor disputes across the country into limbo.

A deal was eventually hashed out to confirm the NLRB nominees and a handful of other Obama picks for other posts. But Cohen and CWA kept lobbying on the issue, in part, Cohen said, because he knew the deal struck over the summer was just a Band-Aid.

"I knew that was a short-term situation," Cohen said. "July 30th" -- the day the board nominees were confirmed -- "was a big day, but I knew then that this was what had to be done."

Asked why he and CWA felt so invested in the fight even after the board was patched up, Cohen said the blocking of nominees for agency posts and judicial positions represented a breakdown of democracy. He said he wasn't worried that the rule change could further deteriorate relations in an already fractious chamber.

"Article 2 of the Constitution talks about advice and consent, not delay and destruct," Cohen said. "Whichever party is there, we need to be able to move nominations to the floor and get an up-or-down vote. It may not be people we all agree on, but that's what the Constitution says.

"There's $7 billion spent on an election," he added. "What does it mean if we get gridlock?"

Despite the victory Thursday, Cohen said he hasn't gotten everything he'd like out of Senate rule reform. He still thinks senators should have to take the floor and hold forth for as long as they want to filibuster.

"If you want to filibuster, you'll have to talk," Cohen said. "You're going to have to talk and senators won't be able to count on going home on Mondays and Fridays. It's sad that it's degenerated like this. But what a kid learns in fifth grade civics class is now so far removed from reality that there's no point in it."

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

2012's Most Expensive Senate Races
Massachusetts -- Scott Brown vs. Elizabeth Warren: $77,270,031(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, left, gestures as he answers a question during a debate against Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren, right, in Lowell, Mass. on Monday, Oct. 1, 2012. (AP Photo/The Boston Herald, Matt Stone, Pool)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Connecticut -- Chris Murphy vs. Linda McMahon: $59,932,468 (02 of10)
Open Image Modal
Democratic candidate, U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., left, and Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Linda McMahon, right, shake hands after a debate in Hartford, Conn., Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Ohio -- Josh Mandel vs. Sherrod Brown: $43,351,434(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, right, shakes hands with Republican challenger, Ohio state treasurer Josh Mandel, after their debate at the City Club in Cleveland Monday, Oct. 15, 2012. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Pennsylvania -- Tom Smith vs. Bob Casey: $35,547,862(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican Tom Smith, left, speaks as Democratic U.S. Sen. Bob Casey looks on during a debate between Pennsylvania's candidates for U.S. Senate, at the WPVI-TV studio, Friday, Oct. 26, 2012, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Virginia -- Tim Kaine vs. George Allen: $32,340,418(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican candidate George Allen, right, looks on as Democratic candidate Tim Kaine speaks during a Senatorial debate for the Virginia U.S. Senate seat on Thursday, Sept. 20, 2012 in McLean, Va. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Missouri -- Todd Akin vs. Claire McCaskill: $27,429,980(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican Rep. Todd Akin and Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill shake hands after the end of the second debate in the Missouri Senate race Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, in Clayton, Mo. (AP Photo/Emily Rasinski)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Wisconsin -- Tommy Thompson vs. Tammy Baldwin: $24,787,727(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican candidate for Wisconsin's U.S. Senate seat, former Gov. Tommy Thompson, left, participates in a debate against Democratic candidate U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin at Marquette University Friday, Oct. 26, 2012, in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Phelps)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Florida -- Bill Nelson vs. Connie Mack IV: $24,699,817(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
Democratic candidate for Senate U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., right, gestures during a debate against Republican candidate Rep. Connie Mack IV, R-Fla., left, Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012, in Davie, Fla. (AP Photo/Alan Diaz)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Montana -- Jon Tester vs. Denny Rehberg: $22,874,724(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
U.S. Sen. Jon Tester greets supporters to announce his win on Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012, in Great Falls, Mont. Tester prevailed in a tight re-election battle, handing Republican U.S. Rep. Denny Rehberg his first election loss since 1996. (AP Photo/Michael Albans)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)
Nevada -- Dean Heller vs. Shelley Berkley: $20,817,344(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
Republican Sen. Dean Heller, left, and Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., arrive for their debate, Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)Source: Center For Responsive Politics (credit:AP)