FBI Warns Sequestration Will Hamper All Their Hard-Hitting Wall Street Investigations

FBI Warns Sequestration Will Hamper All Their Hard-Hitting Wall Street Investigations
|

WASHINGTON -- More than four years after the financial crisis, not a single Wall Street executive has been jailed for playing a role in the creation of the toxic financial products that fueled the real-estate bubble, which were in some cases designed simply to fail.

That track record may make it difficult for the Department of Justice to earn the sympathy of the public as it warns that spending cuts will hamper its ability to investigate Wall Street fraud. The Federal Bureau of Investigations told lawmakers in a recent letter that across-the-board cuts resulting from sequestration "will cause current financial crimes investigations to slow as workload is spread among a reduced workforce. In some instances, such delays could affect the timely interviews of witnesses and collection of evidence."

Investigations yet unseen may also be harmed. "In some instances, such delays could affect the timely interviews of witnesses and collection of evidence. The capacity to undertake new major investigations will be constrained," FBI Director Robert Mueller III wrote in the letter, addressed to Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The warning closed with the type of reasoning that critics of the lack of investigations would readily support. "Left unchecked, fraud and malfeasance in the financial, securities, and related industries could hurt the integrity of U.S. markets," Mueller offered. "In addition, the public will perceive the FBI as less capable of aggressively and actively investigating financial fraud and public corruption, which would undercut the deterrence that comes from strong enforcement."

During President Barack Obama's 2012 State of the Union address, he announced the formation of a task force to investigate Wall Street in a meaningful way. He decided not to mention the unit, which had little to show for itself, in his address a year later.

Former Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.), a Wall Street critic who was passed over to lead that unit, was unpersuaded by the DOJ complaint. "Are they worried that because of sequestration the FBI will interview critical witnesses three years after the statute of limitations has expired instead of just one year? Financial fraud investigations were already under a 'do not resuscitate' order and unresponsive to deep stimulation," Miller told HuffPost. "It's hard for me to worry that DOJ will now be less 'aggressive.'"

Are you a federal employee who received a furlough notice? Please send it to us at openreporting@huffingtonpost.com. We will keep your personal information private.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

What Sequestration Would Cut
Defense(01 of11)
Open Image Modal
About half of the sequestration consists of defense spending cuts, which would "drastically" shrink the military and cancel defense contracts, according to the House Armed Services Committee.(John Cantlie/Getty Images) (credit:Getty Images)
Emergency Response(02 of11)
Open Image Modal
The sequestration would slash funding for the government's emergency response system for disasters such as hurricanes, according to the White House.(Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) (credit:Getty Images)
Unemployment Benefits(03 of11)
Open Image Modal
Checks for unemployed people looking for work would shrink by up to 9 percent, according to the White House.(J Pat Carter/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Homelessness Programs(04 of11)
Open Image Modal
More than 100,000 formerly homeless people would lose their current housing as a result of sequestration, according to the White House.(Mark Lennihan/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Rental Assistance(05 of11)
Open Image Modal
About 125,000 low-income families would be at risk of losing their housing because of rental assistance cuts, according to the White House.(Barry Gutierrez/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Mental Health Programs(06 of11)
Open Image Modal
The sequestration would eliminate care for up to 373,000 "seriously mentally ill" people, according to the White House.(Eric Gay/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Food Safety(07 of11)
Open Image Modal
The FDA would conduct fewer food inspections as a result of sequestration, according to the White House.(Mike Hentz/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Head Start(08 of11)
Open Image Modal
About 70,000 children would lose access to the early education program Head Start as a result of the sequestration, according to the White House.(Elaine Thompson/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Small Business Assistance(09 of11)
Open Image Modal
The government's small business loan guarantees would get slashed by nearly $1 billion as a result of the sequestration, according to the White House.(Steven Senne/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Scientific Research(10 of11)
Open Image Modal
The sequestration would slash scientific research funding at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF), according to the White House.(Spencer Platt/Getty Images) (credit:Getty Images)
HIV Prevention(11 of11)
Open Image Modal
Up to 424,000 HIV tests would be on the chopping block as a result of sequestration, according to the White House. Thousands of people with HIV also would lose access to "life-saving" HIV medications.(Darren Abate/AP Images for AIDS Healthcare Foundation) (credit:AP)