Sequestration May Mean More Military Casualties, Army Chief Of Staff Says

Army Chief Of Staff Says Sequestration May Mean More Military Casualties
Open Image Modal

WASHINGTON -- Army Chief of Staff Ray Odierno on Monday issued a dire warning about sequestration, saying that unless Congress replaces the across-the-board federal budget cuts, more U.S. service members may die on the battlefield.

“Yes we'll still send soldiers. Yes, we'll be able to train them to a lower level and they'll be individually ready, but they will not have been able to train collectively, the way we would like. That means operations will take longer, but most importantly it probably equals more casualties," said Odierno in remarks at the American Enterprise Institute on Monday, as reported by Talk Radio News Service.

The Pentagon has to trim $37 billion from its budget by the end of September due to sequestration. About 90 percent of the department's civilian workforce -- 650,000 people -- have to take 11 days of unpaid leave. The furloughs are expected to save the Pentagon $1.8 billion.

The military is also being affected, however.

“What keeps me up at night is that if I am asked to deploy 20,000 soldiers somewhere, I am not sure I can guarantee that they are trained to a level that I think they should be over the next two or three years because of the way sequestration is being enacted, and that’s really of a concern for me," Odierno said on Monday.

Listen to Odierno's remarks, via Talk Radio News Service:

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has expressed similar concerns.

"Readiness cuts aren't always visible, but these cuts are having and will continue to have very damaging effects," he said recently in a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention.

Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has also said that if Congress does not address sequestration, there will be "a dramatic impact in our readiness."

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

What Sequestration Would Cut
Defense(01 of11)
Open Image Modal
About half of the sequestration consists of defense spending cuts, which would "drastically" shrink the military and cancel defense contracts, according to the House Armed Services Committee.(John Cantlie/Getty Images) (credit:Getty Images)
Emergency Response(02 of11)
Open Image Modal
The sequestration would slash funding for the government's emergency response system for disasters such as hurricanes, according to the White House.(Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) (credit:Getty Images)
Unemployment Benefits(03 of11)
Open Image Modal
Checks for unemployed people looking for work would shrink by up to 9 percent, according to the White House.(J Pat Carter/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Homelessness Programs(04 of11)
Open Image Modal
More than 100,000 formerly homeless people would lose their current housing as a result of sequestration, according to the White House.(Mark Lennihan/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Rental Assistance(05 of11)
Open Image Modal
About 125,000 low-income families would be at risk of losing their housing because of rental assistance cuts, according to the White House.(Barry Gutierrez/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Mental Health Programs(06 of11)
Open Image Modal
The sequestration would eliminate care for up to 373,000 "seriously mentally ill" people, according to the White House.(Eric Gay/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Food Safety(07 of11)
Open Image Modal
The FDA would conduct fewer food inspections as a result of sequestration, according to the White House.(Mike Hentz/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Head Start(08 of11)
Open Image Modal
About 70,000 children would lose access to the early education program Head Start as a result of the sequestration, according to the White House.(Elaine Thompson/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Small Business Assistance(09 of11)
Open Image Modal
The government's small business loan guarantees would get slashed by nearly $1 billion as a result of the sequestration, according to the White House.(Steven Senne/AP Photo) (credit:AP)
Scientific Research(10 of11)
Open Image Modal
The sequestration would slash scientific research funding at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF), according to the White House.(Spencer Platt/Getty Images) (credit:Getty Images)
HIV Prevention(11 of11)
Open Image Modal
Up to 424,000 HIV tests would be on the chopping block as a result of sequestration, according to the White House. Thousands of people with HIV also would lose access to "life-saving" HIV medications.(Darren Abate/AP Images for AIDS Healthcare Foundation) (credit:AP)