Amy Klobuchar Says Pete Buttigieg Wouldn't Qualify For Debates If He Were A Woman

The Minnesota senator suggested that female presidential candidates are held to a higher standard than male contenders.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) on Sunday argued that one of her opponents in the presidential race, South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, would not have qualified for the Democratic primary debates if he were a woman, given his lack of experience in Washington.

“Of the women on the stage ... do I think we would be standing on that stage if we had the experience that he had? No, I don’t,” she said, referring to herself and Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). “Maybe we’re held to a different standard.”

Buttigieg’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the remark.

A New York Times/Siena College survey conducted last month in battleground states found that Buttigieg was 1 to 5 percentage points ahead of Klobuchar among Democratic voters in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. However, Warren, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Vice President Joe Biden were in the lead with double-digit support.

Though Klobuchar said she believes Buttigieg is qualified, at the heart of her criticism is that his political background lies in his eight years as mayor of a small city, rather than having held a state or federal post.

“We should be able to have those debates about candidates without being accused of being negative,” she said.

However, Buttigieg, the youngest candidate in the field at 37 years old, has had to repeatedly defend his experience and has argued that his mayorship allowed him to manage issues felt by everyday Americans in a diverse and mostly low-income area. He has also cited his past military service in Iraq and Afghanistan, whereas neither President Donald Trump nor Barack Obama are veterans.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost