Senate Budget Allows Democrats To Accuse House Republicans Of Hypocrisy

Now It's Democrats Blasting GOP For Stalling Budget
|
Open Image Modal
UNITED STATES - APRIL 11: Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., attends the 2013 National Days of Remembrance ceremony in the Capitol rotunda to honor the victims of the Holocaust. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

WASHINGTON -- Republicans spent four years berating the Democratic-led Senate for failing to pass a budget. Now that the Senate has approved a budget resolution, Democrats are accusing House Republican leaders of retreating from the legislative process they demanded.

"Republicans have repeatedly called for regular order ... they call for regular order all of the time," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said at a press conference Wednesday, noting that House Democratic leaders sent a letter to House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) urging him to appoint conferees "without delay." "They’ve repeatedly chastised the Senate for not passing a budget bill," Pelosi said.

"Regular order" refers to the legislative process under which bills go through a committee and then to the floor, allowing lawmakers to debate and make amendments. The alternative is often leaders putting forward bills, sometimes negotiated in backroom deals, and bringing them straight to the floor without much chance for amendments.

Democrats have spent the week escalating pressure on Republicans to convene a budget conference committee. That committee would sift through the vastly different Senate and House budgets, and identify areas of agreement. But House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said he wants a pre-conference framework first, even though until recently he, too, demanded regular order.

"In the past four years, the Senate hadn't done a budget. That means the process stopped," Ryan told CNN last month. "What we call regular order, where the House and the Senate pass a budget, then you try to reconcile the differences."

This week, Ryan told reporters on Capitol Hill the parties were so far apart that a conference wouldn't result in an agreement. Ryan added that he was working with Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-Wash.) to iron out differences in their budget plans.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said Ryan was using "lousy" excuses.

Van Hollen sent Boehner his own letter, signed by all 17 Democrats on the House Budget Committee, calling for the speaker to convene a committee.

"The American public deserves this open debate. This is about our priorities and values of the country -- and how they're reflected in the budget," Van Hollen said in an interview with The Huffington Post. "It sounds like what Republicans are proposing is everybody go behind closed doors to figure this out, which directly contradicts everything they have told the American public about their approach."

Boehner defended the GOP's approach Thursday, arguing that the House majority was in fact following regular order.

"The chairmen of the two committees are talking, and as you all know, it’s customary that there’s no appointment of a formal conference until such time as there’s some basic framework worked out from which they can proceed," Boehner said at a press conference. He added that Democrats were seeking a conference committee because it would enable them to bring "politically motivated" motions to the floor.

"Under rules, if you appoint conferees and after 20 legislative days there’s no agreement, the minority has the right to offer motions to instruct, which become politically motivated bombs to throw up on the House floor," Boehner said. "So to be frank with all of you, we’re following what I would describe as regular order. These informal conversations are underway, and that’s the way it should be."

But Democrats said they had a clear sense of how a conference could work in their favor. Their goal, Van Hollen said, was for each party to litigate its vision for a fiscal pathway. He suggested Republicans were afraid to expose the "extremist, lop-sided nature" of Ryan's budget.

Democrats said they are confident there's widespread support for replacing the damaging cuts brought onto domestic spending by sequestration, rather than cutting further into non-defense programs as Ryan's budget does. Democrats have also signaled a willingness to cut entitlement spending if Republicans agree to new tax revenues. GOP leadership has emphatically stated that any new tax increases are off the table.

"I don't think that they're arguments will stand up in the light of day," Van Hollen said.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

How Paul Ryan's Budget Would Hurt The Poor
1. Paul Ryan's Budget Would Kill Millions Of Jobs(01 of07)
Open Image Modal
His plan would cut the budget by $4.6 trillion over the next 10 years. These budget cuts would raise the unemployment rate, shrink the economy and eliminate 2 million jobs in 2014 alone, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a progressive think tank.(AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster) (credit:AP)
2. Paul Ryan's Budget Would Cut Medicaid(02 of07)
Open Image Modal
His budget would slash Medicaid spending by $756 billion and turn the program into a block-grant program for states. It also would eliminate Obamacare's Medicaid expansion, which would have provided Medicaid coverage for an estimated 12 million more people.(AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis) (credit:AP)
3. Paul Ryan's Budget Would Let States Kick People Off Of Food Stamps(03 of07)
Open Image Modal
His budget would turn the food stamp program into a block-grant program for states. It also would encourage states to limit the amount of time that the unemployed can access food stamps and limit food stamp eligibility mostly to workers.(AP Photo/Dinesh Ramde) (credit:AP)
4. Paul Ryan's Budget Would Cut Medicare(04 of07)
Open Image Modal
His budget would cut Medicare spending and turn the program into a subsidized private-insurance program. This would translate into less health care for seniors, according to the Washington Post's Ezra Klein, as well as more expensive health insurance, according to the left-leaning Center for American Progress.(AP Photo/Jeff Barnard) (credit:AP)
5. Paul Ryan's Budget Would Repeal Obamacare(05 of07)
Open Image Modal
If it stays in effect, Obamacare would reduce the number of uninsured Americans by 27 million by 2023, according the Congressional Budget Office.(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File) (credit:AP)
6. Paul Ryan's Budget Would Deny Welfare Benefits To People Who Aren't Working(06 of07)
Open Image Modal
His budget would limit eligibility for the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) welfare program mostly to people that are working.(Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images) (credit:AP)
7. Paul Ryan's Budget Would Cut Funding For Programs That Help The Poor(07 of07)
Open Image Modal
His budget would cut funding for a variety of domestic programs -- potentially including child care, education, women's preventive health care and domestic violence prevention, according to the National Women's Law Center.(AP Photo/Michael Dwyer) (credit:AP)