Politicspredatory lending newtown gramm leach bliley

Angus King, Senate Newcomer, Joins Elizabeth Warren In Fight To Reform Financial System

New Senator Takes Cue From Elizabeth Warren
By 

Senior Reporter, HuffPost

and

Former Washington Bureau Chief, HuffPost

|

WASHINGTON -- Freshman Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) joined Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) this week in the fight to rein in the financial establishment. In an interview with Maine newspaper the Portland Press-Herald, the new lawmaker called for major structural reform to the American banking system.

King, who caucuses with Democrats but does not identify as one, listed several progressive policy preferences in a Dec. 30 interview with the paper. Among his dream policies: filibuster reform, tighter gun-control laws and the reimplementation of Glass-Steagall.

"For 70 years, Glass-Steagall protected us from what just happened, where we had to bail out the commercial banks because they were a fundamental part of the financial system of the world," King told the Press-Herald. "Instead of approaching it from the point of view of regulation, it was a structural change, and you always do better if you can come up with structural solutions. Because no matter how you write regulations, people always find a way to get around them and distort things and have unintended consequences."

Glass-Steagall, repealed in 1999, banned banks that accept insured deposits from participating in securities markets, ensuring that taxpayer dollars and guarantees weren't devoted to speculation. The 1935 law was a much stricter reform than the Volcker Rule, which allows banks to trade securities on behalf of others, but not for their own accounts. Many financial experts have argued that the Volcker Rule, which Congress passed in 2010, can be manipulated by banks duping regulators with complex securities schemes that only appear to be made on behalf of their clients. Big banks have spent nearly two years lobbying hard with regulatory agencies for complicated exemptions to the rule.

In his interview with the Press-Herald, King joined the critics of the rule and favored more stringent regulation.

Warren has also bemoaned the 1999 repeal of Glass-Steagall, publicly releasing details about the excessive risk-taking on Wall Street she saw during her tenure as a watchdog for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was created by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, was her idea, and Warren helped get the new agency off the ground. A political affinity between supporters of King and Warren was on display at Thursday's swearing-in ceremony, where both senators officially started their jobs.

One man told Warren about King's comments as the senator went into her ceremonial swearing-in ceremony, and suggested Warren partner with him. Warren promised she'd look into it. After her ceremony, a woman who said she was King's sister spoke with Warren.

"I've been admiring [you] for so long. I'm Angus King's sister and I've just been watching your race and praying. It was wonderful," the woman said. Warren said she looked forward to working with King. "You'll enjoy him. He's funny, has a great sense of humor," King's sister said.

King had a few words against Dodd-Frank in the Press-Herald interview, insisting that small banks "are just being hammered" by some of the legislation's new regulations. Most small banks, however, are entirely exempt from the major provisions of Dodd-Frank. The rules that still apply to small banks generally cover practices like predatory lending, which are not major activities for them. As a result, small banks do not typically lose new business from the rules.

King served on the board of the Bank of Maine prior to being elected to the Senate in November.

"I'm a regulo-skeptic both from my own experience and from my experience as governor," King told the Press-Herald. "One of the things I will pay attention to in Congress is if regulations are reasonable and are doing what they were intended to do."

When discussing other topics with the Press-Herald, King sounded like a progressive. He criticized the excessive use of the filibuster by the Republican Party, noting that Lyndon Johnson only faced one filibuster during his six years as Senate majority leader, compared to 386 against current Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

"It's become the norm that any piece of substantive legislation has to get 60 votes, and that's not the way the Constitution was designed," King told the Press-Herald. "Abuse of the filibuster … moves us toward a government that can't act, and we need to act. We've got all these problems."

King said the right move is to make filibustering senators actually talk, rather than allowing them to simply declare a filibuster and deem the legislation defeated. That plan has been pushed by Reid, but Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) have pushed an alternate reform that would actually give the minority party more power to derail legislation.

"If they have to stand there and read the New York phone directory, it will be much more apparent to the public who is doing the blocking and what lengths they are going to," King told the Press-Herald.

King also called for stricter gun control rules than the 1994 assault weapons ban, which lapsed in 2004, and urged Congress to require all political donors to disclose their political spending -- a move that could ameliorate some of the fallout from the Supreme Court's Citizen's United ruling.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Do These Things, Don't Cut Entitlements
Prison Reform(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
The U.S. incarcerates its citizens at a rate roughly five times higher than the global average. We have about 5 percent of the world's population, but 25 percent of its prisoners, according to The Economist,. This status quo costs our local, state and federal governments a combined $68 billion a year -- all of which becomes a federal problem during recessions, when states look to Washington for fiscal relief. Over the standard 10-year budget window used in Congress, that's a $680 billion hit to the deficit.Solving longstanding prison problems -- releasing elderly convicts unlikely to commit crimes, offering treatment or counseling as an alternative to prison for non-violent offenders, slightly shortening the sentences of well-behaved inmates, and substituting probation for more jail-time -- would do wonders for government spending. (credit:AP)
End Of The Drug War(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
The federal government spends more than $15 billion a year investigating and prosecuting the War on Drugs. That's $150 billion in Washington budget-speak, and it doesn't include the far higher costs of incarcerating millions of people for doing drugs. This money isn't getting the government the results it wants. As drug war budgets balloon, drug use escalates.Ending the Drug War offers the government two separate budget boons. In addition to saving all the money spending investigating, prosecuting and incarcerating drug offenders, Uncle Sam could actually regulate and tax drugs like marijuana, generating new revenue. Studies by pot legalization advocates indicate that fully legalizing weed in California would yield up to $18 billion annually for that state's government alone. For the feds, the benefits are even sweeter. (credit:AP)
Let Medicare Negotiate With Big Pharma(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
The U.S. has higher health care costs than any other country. We spend over 15 percent of our total economic output each year on health care -- roughly 50 percent more than Canada, and double what the U.K. spends.Why? The American private health care system is inefficient, and the intellectual property rules involving medication in the U.S. can make prescription drugs much more expensive than in other countries. Medicare currently spends about $50 billion a year on prescription drugs. According to economist Dean Baker, Americans spend roughly 10 times more than they need to on prescription drugs as a result of our unique intellectual property standards. These savings for the government, of course, would come from the pockets of major pharmaceutical companies, currently among the most profitable corporations the world has ever known. They also exercise tremendous clout inside the Beltway. President Barack Obama even guaranteed drug companies more restrictive -- and lucrative -- intellectual property standards in order to garner their support for the Affordable Care Act. (credit:Alamy)
Offshore Tax Havens(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
The U.S. Treasury Department estimates that it loses about $100 billion a year in revenue due to offshore tax haven abuses. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) has been pushing legislation for years to rein in this absurd tax maneuvering, but corporate lobbying on Capitol Hill has prevented the bill from becoming law. (credit:Alamy)
Deprivatize Government Contract Work(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
In recent years, the federal government has privatized an enormous portion of public projects to government contractors. Over the past decade, the federal government's staffing has held steady, while the number of federal contractors has increased by millions. This outsourcing has resulted in much higher costs for the government than would be incurred by simply doing the work in-house. On average, contractors are paid nearly double what a comparable federal employee would receive for the same job, according to the Project On Government Oversight. (credit:Alamy)
Print More Money(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
There's an old saying in economics: You have to print money to make money. Okay, there's no such saying. Nevertheless, the great boogeyman of many conservative economic doctrines -- inflation -- isn't such a bad idea during periods where much of the citizenry is drowning in debt.Inflation is by no means a perfect remedy: it's a stealth cut to workers' wages. But it also has many benefits that are often unacknowledged by the Washington intelligentsia. Inflation makes housing debt, student loan debt and any other private-sector debt more manageable. Today, when 10.8 million homes are underwater -- meaning borrowers owe banks than their houses are worth, moderate inflation could ease that debt burden. By effectively reducing monthly bills, moderate inflation could actually put more money in the pockets of these homeowners to spend elsewhere, thus stimulating the economy. Moderate inflation -- 5 percent or so -- could also help alleviate the $1 trillion in student debt currently plaguing America's graduates.Make no mistake -- hyperinflation of 20 percent, 30 percent or more -- is bad. But the U.S. has ways to crush inflation when it gets out of hand, as proven by the Federal Reserve under then-Chairman Paul Volcker in the early-1980s. (credit:Getty Images)
Print Less Money(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
The government prints a lot of $1 bills. But it turns out that minting $1 coins is much, much cheaper. Over the course of 30 years, the government could save $4.4 billion by switching from dollar bills to dollar coins. Here's looking at you, Sacagawea. (credit:Alamy)
Immigration: Less Detention, More Ankle Bracelets(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
The government spends $122 per person, per day detaining immigrants who are considered safe and unlikely to commit crimes. The government has plenty of other options available to monitor such people, at a cost of as little as $15 per person.For the first 205 years of America's existence, there was no federal system for detaining immigrants. The process began in 1981. (credit:Alamy)
Financial Speculation Tax(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
Wall Street loves to gamble. In good times, financial speculation is the source of tremendous profits in America's banking system, but when the bets go bad, the government picks up the tab, as evidenced by the epic bank bailouts of 2008 and 2009. Unfortunately, this speculation is difficult to define in legalistic terminology and even more difficult to police. One solution? By taxing every financial trade at the ultra-low rate of 0.25 percent, the U.S. government can impose a modest incentive against gambling for the sheer sake of gambling. If there's an immediate cost to placing a bet, a lot of traders will choose not to bet.What's more, this tax could raise about $150 billion a year for the federal government. (credit:Alamy)
Carbon Tax(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
Taxing greenhouse gases would generate $80 billion a year right now, and up to $310 billion a year by 2050, according to an analysis by the Brookings Institution. It would also help avert catastrophic ecological and economic damage from climate change. (credit:Alamy)
Suggest a correction
|
Submit a tip